Step 01
Connect read-only support knowledge
Point Meihaku at the docs, tickets, macros, and notes your team already relies on.


AI Support Readiness · Pre-flight your agent
Stop spending weeks manually reviewing docs, tickets, macros, and internal notes. Meihaku maps your existing support knowledge against real customer intents, surfaces gaps and conflicts, and gives your team an approved answer set before an AI agent talks to customers.
Launch readiness · click to watch the overview
Product overview
The audit loop is deliberately narrow: connect the knowledge you already have, map it to customer intents, resolve blockers, then approve only what your team can defend.
01
Connect
Docs, tickets, macros
02
Map
Customer intents by readiness
03
Resolve
Gaps and conflicts
04
Approve
Approved answer set
Step 01
Point Meihaku at the docs, tickets, macros, and notes your team already relies on.

Step 02
See which customer questions are covered, conflicted, or missing before your AI support agent handles them.

Step 03
When two sources disagree, reviewers see both claims side by side and choose the canonical answer.

Step 04
Only source-backed answers become part of the approved answer set your downstream agent can use.

Why readiness comes first
If the source knowledge is missing, stale, or contradictory, your AI agent can still answer with confidence. Meihaku addresses the source-readiness layer; runtime moderation and agent-platform guardrails handle the rest.
Air Canada
Tribunal ordered the airline to honor a bereavement-fare policy its chatbot invented. C$812 + ruling that the chatbot is part of the website.
Moffatt v. Air Canada, BCCRT 2024 →Cursor
Support bot “Sam” invented a one-device-per-subscription policy that did not exist. Subscription cancellations followed.
Fortune, April 2025 →DPD
Chatbot swore at a customer and wrote a poem calling DPD “the worst delivery firm in the world.” 1.3M views on X.
TIME, January 2024 →“Air Canada is responsible for all of the information on its website, regardless of whether said information comes from a ‘static’ webpage or a chatbot.”
Readiness, not chat
Most teams discover the real work after the chatbot project starts: outdated docs, conflicting policies, missing answers, and tribal knowledge trapped in tickets. Meihaku turns that cleanup into a structured launch-readiness map.
Connect read-only docs, tickets, macros, and notes. Meihaku keeps citations tied to source evidence.
It matches customer questions to source evidence, drafts cited answers, and flags the gaps and conflicts blocking safe automation.
Review each draft with sources attached. Approved intents become the answer set your AI agent is cleared to handle. Unsupported intents stay blocked.
Built for the support manager carrying launch risk
See which intents have approved answers, which are blocked, and which need a human before launch. The boundary is explicit.
Review the exact policy line, macro, or article behind each draft before approving it.
Meihaku does the reading and first pass from the materials you already have. Your team only greenlights what is safe to ship.
Missing or conflicting intents stay out of automation until your team has source evidence or a handoff path.
Readiness guides
Practical SEO guides for support leaders auditing knowledge, policies, testing, and escalation before AI agents reach customers.
View all articlesAI agent testing
A support-specific AI agent testing checklist for policy coverage, source citations, stale answers, escalation rules, and launch go/no-go decisions.
ReadAI chatbot testing
A practical chatbot testing checklist for support teams checking accuracy, policy safety, escalation, tone, and re-contact risk before launch.
ReadKnowledge-base audit
A step-by-step AI knowledge base audit for finding stale articles, policy conflicts, missing intents, weak citations, and unsafe automation scope.
ReadAI support readiness
A practical six-dimension framework for auditing knowledge, policies, testing, handoffs, owners, and metrics before an AI support agent answers customers.
ReadFrequently asked
Hallucinations usually happen when the model can’t find a clear answer in the source material it retrieves from. Meihaku audits your support docs, tickets, macros, and notes for the gaps and conflicts that force the model to guess, then gates which intents your agent is cleared to answer. Many teams pair Meihaku as the pre-flight check with runtime tools like Cleanlab or Ada-style monitoring as the in-flight safety net.
Yes — and it’s the cleanest case to start with. Meihaku audits your support knowledge before you commit to a vendor. You’ll know in advance which intents are well-supported, which need source cleanup, and which can’t be answered safely by any agent. Most teams find the audit changes which agent they pick, because some handle gap-prone intents better than others.
Meihaku is the readiness layer that runs before and alongside AI support agents, not a replacement. Tools like Intercom Fin, Decagon, Sierra, and Maven generate answers at runtime. Meihaku audits whether your knowledge base actually supports those answers in the first place, surfacing conflicts, gaps, and ungrounded intents before they reach a customer. Most teams use Meihaku to pre-flight an AI agent rollout, then keep it running as a governance layer.
Google Drive folders containing your support policies, SOPs, macros, and FAQ docs, plus Zendesk source bundles. Intercom, Notion, Confluence, and broader helpdesk connectors are on the near-term roadmap. Meihaku connects read-only and never writes back to the source — what you see in the audit is exactly what your team approves.
No. Meihaku is complementary. Your AI agent (Fin, Decagon, Sierra, custom) still answers customers. Meihaku decides which intents are cleared for that agent to handle, with cited evidence, and exports the approved answer set. Unsupported or conflicting intents stay out of automation until your team has source evidence or a handoff path.
Yes — that’s the core workflow. Meihaku drafts cited answers from your sources, your team reviews each one with the source line attached, and only approved intents become the boundary your AI agent operates inside. Nothing reaches production until you greenlight it.
That’s the most common starting point — and exactly what Meihaku is designed for. You don’t need to rewrite anything before connecting. Meihaku reads what you have, drafts cited answers from the strongest evidence, flags gaps and conflicts, and lets your team triage them in priority order. The first audit usually surfaces the small set of intents blocking most of the customer-risk conversations.
No. Customer data is processed in your isolated workspace. We don’t train foundation models on your content, and we don’t share data across customers. Source content is processed transiently and not retained beyond what’s needed for citations.
Connect support knowledge read-only. Meihaku finds the gaps and conflicts blocking launch, then helps your team approve what the AI is cleared to say.